India entered into a new conflict with Pakistan. So far, the diplomatic reason was the attack of militants on tourists in Jamma and Kashmir. With a terrorist attack, 26 people died

On Tuesday, April 22, a group of militants attacked tourists in the Baysaran Valley near the Pakhalgam city in the Jamma and Kashmir region in the north of India. 26 people were killed – visitors from different regions of India and one Nepalev. This is the most bloody terrorist attack in India since the Islamists in Mumbai in 2008. The “Resistance Front”-the previously little-known division of the Dzhikhadist group “Lashkar-Yaba” (translated from URDU is the “righteous army”), based in the Pakistani part of Kashmir. Kashmir-, because of the India and the Region, due Pakistan has been conflict for nearly 80 years. They fought several times. Most of the population there are Muslims. The declared goal of Lashkar-Eba is the separation of Kashmir from India. At the same time, a significant part of its militants – Indian Muslims. The Owners say that the attackers asked the tourists, the Hindus or Muslims – and the Hindus shot. They spared at least one woman with a small child. Her husband was killed. The Indian security forces unveiled portraits of three alleged terrorists created by a police artist according to the descriptions of eyewitnesses. How many attackers were, it is unknown. In the Baysaran Valley, the search for terrorists continues. India Prime Minister Narendra Modi promised that they would be found “at least on the edge of the world.” The “Resistance Front” was an interior for the terrorist attack by the Indian authorities for the construction of 80 thousand people in Kashmir. It is expected that it will be immigrants from other parts of India, mainly Hindus. Thus, the demographic composition of the disputed region will change. The Indian authorities did not make official statements about involvement in the terrorist attack of the Pakistani state. But with their actions they made it clear that they have at least part of the guilt on him. The day after the attack, India closed the border with Pakistan and canceled the visas issued to the Pakistanis. They are ordered to leave India within three days. Vice-Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan Ishak Gift called the reaction of India to the terrorist attack of “immature and hasty.” He demanded: “If there is evidence of Pakistan’s involvement in the Pakhalmsk incident, please share them with us and the international community.” Pakistan has introduced retaliatory measures to India’s actions: he closed the border for people and goods, and also closed his airspace for Indian airlines. Both parties also mutually sent many diplomats and threatened each other with a way out of bilateral agreements on a ceasefire and on the joint use of the water of the Indo River. Iskhaka Dar, due to the diplomatic crisis, had to postpone a visit to Bangladesh. “Lashkar-E-Tayba”-far from the only Islamist terrorist organization in Pakistan. But, unlike most of them, she repeatedly publicly stated that she did not consider the secular Pakistani regime her enemy. It is widely known about the long -standing connections of this group with Pakistani Interdepartmental intelligence, which uses it as an instrument of confrontation with India (although it officially denies it). The Text in Pakhalgam was a blow to the policy of the Indian government of Modi against Jammu and Kashmir. Not further than in December 2023, he finally realized his long -standing intention to deprive this state of autonomy. He sought to expand the possibilities of the central authority on the economic development of the region, including the tourist sector. The other side, the new status of Jammu and Kashmir expanded the powers of the Indian security forces in the region. In his first speech, after Modi’s attack, he proclaimed that “it was time to destroy the remnants of the terror of terror (in Kashmir).” This probably means strengthening repressions against Muslim organizations in the region. India deprived Kashmir’s autonomous status – the area for which three times in modern history fought with Pakistan this can lead not only to the repressions of the local opposition, but also the new WojuinDiya deprived the autonomous status of Kashmir – for which this could not only lead to this in modern history with Pakistan. repressions of the local opposition, but also a new war (Tagstotranslate) News

Credit-Read More

Read More full article

Share to Spread
Subscribe for notification
Exit mobile version