Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption Syria’s ousted President Bashar al-Assad, who ruled the country for more than 24 years…The speed and significance of Bashar al-Assad’s “historic” fall has shocked the US. Have kept it. But President Biden is also taking credit for it. In his statement, he described the extraordinary transfer of power in Syria as the result of American strategy. He said that through this the role of Russia and Iran in that region was fundamentally weakened and it helped in ending the regime of Bashar al-Assad. But the reality is that America hardly thought that Hamas The military support given to Israel against Syria and to Ukraine against Russia will prove helpful in ending Assad’s rule in Syria. Image caption, to join BBC Hindi’s WhatsApp channel Click here for But, now it has happened. And now America will have to face its consequences. According to Biden, this is a “historic opportunity”, but also a moment of “risk and uncertainty”. America is trying to find out what will happen next? Who will rule Syria? The President also met his national security team at the White House on Sunday morning. In fact, in October 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel. At that time, America had provided military support to Israel. At the same time, when Russia attacked Ukraine in the year 2022, America started providing military support to Ukraine. Also read America, what will it do now? Image source, Getty Images Image caption US President Joe Biden said in a statement that the developments in Syria were part of the US strategy. Will not mourn the disgrace of. Actually, America’s fear is about the void that has arisen after Assad’s removal. Because, this situation is unpleasant for America. Because, the situation which America wants the least can happen in Syria. For example, power going into the hands of those Islamic rebels, whose names have been designated by America as terrorist groups. This situation could create chaos and new risks in large parts of Syria. As Damascus rejoices over the fall of Assad, the majority of Syrian citizens do not fully agree with America’s position. At the same time, America will also appreciate the end of Assad for some time, but its serious concern will be about who will replace Assad in Syria? Also read: What did the US Defense Department say? America had said this earlier. has made it clear that US troops will remain in eastern Syria, although it officially has a small force to combat the so-called Islamic State group. Daniel Shapiro, Deputy Secretary of Defense for the Middle East, said all Called on the parties to protect all civilians, especially minorities, and respect international rules. They said, “We are conscious of the ongoing chaotic conditions on the ground in Syria, which make it possible for ISIS to remain active, and for external operations to take place.” “We stand ready to work with allies who are committed to reducing their (ISIS) capabilities.” new with What will be the reaction of the powers that be? But, it seems that now America’s entire emphasis will be on stabilizing the situation in Syria through talks through its favorite groups. Also read: Will America change its stance? Image source, Getty Images Image caption, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, the organization leading the rebels, seems to be showing signs of improving its own image. Earlier, during the civil war in Syria, the then US President Barack Obama had limited those people. Those who gave permission for support were liberal rebels in the eyes of America. The case was later dropped as the extremists began to dominate the war and Russia began fighting on Assad’s side. The United States at the time appealed to the United Nations to reach a negotiated settlement between Assad and opposition forces. Had supported the process of Assad. Now there is a possibility that after the departure of Assad, there will be a change in America’s attitude towards making a compromise between his people and the rebels. The groups of rebels who have captured Damascus Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, which leads the group, has repeatedly signaled a change in its image and has renounced its ties to al-Qaeda. The idea of violent revenge has been rejected. But the US is unlikely to trust the group, as it has designated the group as a terrorist organisation. However, some people in the region who are in close contact with the US authorities Yes, they consider this viewpoint insulting. He says that the process of change should be adopted in Damascus keeping in mind the opposition of the Syrian citizens. Also read: What do the people of Syria want? Image source, Getty Images Image caption, All the parties in Syria want their country Russia, Iran should be free from the influence of ISIS. Mouz Mustafa is part of the Syrian Emergency Task Force in America. He is active as a coordinator between the US Army and allied forces in Syria. He says that what has come out so far is good, which cannot be expressed in words. But, America should not limit it to the actions of one group. He told BBC, “There is an operation room, where there are groups of different political ideologies. Some of them are secular, some are conservative, but on one thing. They are willing. They all want to free Syria from Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Russia. In his statement, President Biden said that some groups are saying the right things in Syria. Are. But, he will evaluate him on the basis of his actions. Meanwhile, newly elected President Donald Trump had made a post on Syria. In this he described Syria as a “mess” and said that America should stay out of it. “This is not our fight.” He also held Obama responsible in his remarks. And had said that Russia should also distance itself from this country. And he also said that Russia should try to end the war by talking to Ukraine. Trump had said, “I know Vladimir Putin very well. It is time for him to take action.” Year 2019 While being President, Trump had made a surprising announcement. That was that he had announced the withdrawal of American troops from Syria. It may be that Trump is eyeing to re-impose the previous situation. Published by Collective Newsroom for BBC.
