The judge starts the car while a camera takes it from behind, right profile. It conducts a few seconds until a warning alarm sounds. Julieta Makintach, surprised, hears the dashboard beep and only then puts on the seat belt. It is concentrated in its role as an actress of a documentary that stars: Divine Justice. Divine Diego? Divine she? -How was the question?, Tells who accompanies her, out of the camera.-What is what you are looking for with the social action you do in your role as judge … -The people give you the problems for you to solve them … You are a social server-, answer. It passes your fingers between your hair. Look at the sides with dark glasses. She is the girl of a convertible in Ocean Drive, arriving with a cameraman and producer to the courts of San Isidro. The judge of the Maradona case felt Maradona. Day, she -subrogant, of another court -appeared sitting at the center of the court of the judges, driving for the first time a debate that had been two months. Judge Savarino said that he had resolved to leave the presidency in the hands of the other judge -Verónica di Tommaso -but that the debate would be conducting Makintach. There were no plausible reasons about the strange pirouette of the sudden change of roles. What arguments were Makintach convinced to give him the center of the scene like that, from one day to the other? Difficult to believe that Makintach colleagues did not suspect, not even a little, what was happening. Not participating does not necessarily mean ignoring. Documentary. Don’t see it? Nobody says anything. His fate seems sealed, just like that of the judge of the scandal. In the script that kidnapped justice in the raids of the case, it was written that Maradona was killed. The royal verdict would change the script or the script anticipated the verdict? Now there are between the parties – accused and accused – a consensus to appoint other judges and start again. And what else? The defenders earn time to review strategies and keep their representatives free and with the presumption of innocence intact until another trial demonstrates the opposite, if it demonstrates it. The complainants seek solvency in a court that does not fall apart before the first appeal for strange attitudes when issuing a sentence. Cosachov, after it indicated the responsibility of Maradona’s prepaid in its domiciliary hospitalization. Another of the accused is Nancy Forlini, coordinator of Swiss Medical. The day of that interrogation is remembered by the chroniclers who follow the trial because, only once, the three judges were dressed completely black.If the judge will “defend” the prepaid -to which a civil trial could follow if their coordinator was condemned in this criminal process -, better to start all the reason for the reason. complaint. Civil lawsuit is “tied” to the criminal trial. A hypothetical condemnation of the Prepaid coordinator opens the door to go against Swiss Medical. An acquittal closes it. It transcended in the judicial halls of San Isidro that there will be a request for 14 million dollars as a compensation in a hypothetical civil trial. Nothing was excessive in the Maradona world.
