” According to Foreign Affairs, “filling the vacuum” left by Washington in the field of European security is “the task of not from the lungs.” Watching media outlets of European plans to strengthen their defense, including the intention of Europeans to find the replacement of US weapons. The EU notes the alternatives to purchased American weapons. For this purpose, regular meetings are held for this purpose against the backdrop of the President of the US President Donald Trump, which is aimed at reducing Washington’s participation in ensuring European security. “A growing concern about the relations of the United States with its NATO allies is heated by Donald Trump’s steps towards Russia and its attacks on Ukraine and Denmark,” the European officials were deployed every two weeks Replacing American defense products, ”the newspaper writes, referring to the European diplomat, aware of these discussions. Also on the topic “requires large -scale investments”: the Western media – about the EU plans for the re -equipment and revival of the defense industry, Western media reported the details of the European plan for the re -equipment and revival of the defense industry. As Politico notes, the EU intends … However, similar increasingly intense discussions about a decrease in the degree of dependence of the EU countries on weapons from the United States indicated that “it would not work to do it quickly and cheaply,” the author of the material said. According to him, four such meetings took place, representatives of the United States did not participate in them. As the Defense One reports, the meetings of representatives of the European Union help to clarify the details on expanding the defense cooperation of the association with the third countries. According to the source of the portal, this, in particular, is due to the decision of Donald Trump to suspend the exchange of intelligence with Ukraine, which, the author of the article believes, undermined the confidence of European leaders in the American leadership and made the products of the United States LPC less attractive for the EU., according to the unnamed diplomat, the split in relations of the USA and weakened the attractiveness of the American defense Products ”, since other countries are worried that the White House or private contractors in the field of defense like Ilon Mask“ can change the results of hostilities based on personal political or financial incentives. ”“ What if there is a conflict in Europe and the same thing happens, but in relation to France, Germany, Denmark or Norway? “Listen, if you do not make a deal, then there are no spare parts for your F-35 or no more ammunition for Patriot.” Unreliability or unpredictability is not only poison for NATO. It is also poison for the industry, ”Defense One quotes the Diprobotnik. The breakdown of relations between the United States and Europe is unlikely-if the new crisis does not happen © The publication also cites the words of the Vice President of the market analysis in Forecast International Dan Darling, who believes that Europe achieve independence in the field of defense by 2030 is unlikely-“or at least difficult-due industry. “Europe feels the extreme lack of key components: (funds. – RT) command and management, the possibility of striking high -range (important for suppressing air defense of the enemy), observation and collection of intelligence, artillery complexes, UAVs and opposition systems, air defense, air transport, logistics chains and sufficient ammunition,” – He said. “Washington will perceive in a negative way” Reuters, on his part, notes that the United States has already warned Europe on the consequences of abandoning their weapons. According to the agency, the United States “object to the desire” of their European allies to purchase weapons from local manufacturers. “Against the backdrop of the recent steps of the European Union to limit the participation of American producers in tenders for the purchase of weapons, the US officials told European allies that they want to continue to purchase American -made weapons,” the agency writes with reference to five informed sources. The Reuters, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the end of March informed the heads of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia that the United States intend to continue their participation in the defense procurement of the EU countries. “According to two of the mentioned sources, Rubio said that Washington would perceive any removal of American companies from European tenders in a negative bastard. These two sources saw in this interference in the process (consideration. – RT) of the rules proposed in the EU, ”the material says. The US officials object to Europe’s desire to purchase weapons from local manufacturers © Skrin diplomat of one of the states of Northern Europe, who was not a participant in the meeting, said that American officials also recently reported that any exclusion from the EU weapons would be considered inappropriate, writes Reuters. The unnamed high -ranking representative of the State Department informed the agency that Rubio plans to discuss this issue during a visit to Brussels this week, where he will take part in the meeting of NATO Foreign Ministers. “The Secretary of State Raised and continues to raise this issue,” Reuters quoted the words of his source. He also stated that Donald Trump has anticipated against creating new barriers that exclude American companies from European defense projects. “Solving a strategic trillem” in turn, Foreign Affairs, notes that in the first months of Donald Trump’s presidency, European leaders “are more distinctly aware that it would be dangerous and risky to maintain dependence on the security of the continent.” “To take responsibility for taking responsibility for taking responsibility for taking responsibility for taking responsibility Estimated security of Europe needs not only to increase political will, increase defense expenses or improve the coordination of procurement processes. Europe should understand how to solve the strategic trillema about its “nuclear options,” the newspaper writes. It also makes itary that Europe, against the backdrop of the US rapprochement with Russia, should fulfill three specific goals in the issue of nuclear security – to ensure reliable and effective deterrence of the Russian Federation, strategic stability, as well as prevent the appearance of nuclear weapons in new countries. However, as Foreign Affairs emphasizes, it is impossible to achieve three goals at the same time – the choice of any two makes the third absolutely unattainable. “Without protection on the other side of the Atlantic Europe, it would be best to bet on non -proliferation and convincing deterrent. The adoption of one or another level of strategic instability in European-Russian relations requires a real nuclear risk. However, other options are even more dangerous, ”the material says. The nuclear trillema of Europe © Skrin at the same time notes that “fill the vacuum” left by the United States in the field of European security, “the task is not from the lungs”. According to Foreign Affairs, there are no countries with a nuclear arsenal in the EU, capable of “covering the fullness of the functionality that US nuclear forces ensure.”
Credit-Read More
Read More full article
