Great Britain supports Ukraine for all three years that have passed since the beginning of a full -scale Russian invasion, but still remained hidden to which London was involved in the conflict. This is stated in the publication of The Times under the heading “Unexplored story about the decisive role of the British military leaders in Ukraine.” According to journalists, Great Britain at least twice sent their military to Ukraine to teach Ukrainian soldiers to use British weapons. In February 2022, shortly after the start of Russian invasion, several dozen of the British military, who trained in Kyiv, trained The Armed Forces of Ukraine by the use of NLAW anti -tank missiles. In May 2023, Great Britain announced the supplies of Ukraine’s long -range cruise missiles Storm Shadow. Then the British military were secretly sent to Ukraine to equip Ukrainian aircraft with missiles and teach the Armed Forces of Ukraine to use them. General -Kilia also participated in the preparation of counter -offices of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in 2023. A few weeks before the start of the offensive, the British general, the head of the strategic command, James Hokenhall met with the head of the Main Directorate of the Intelligence of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine Kirill Budanov. According to The Times, they discussed how to achieve the goals of the counterattack, and at the disposal of the general there were some “very secret” data. The publication notes that this was no longer the first meeting of Budanov and Hokenhalla. For the first time they met back in 2019. According to one of the sources of the newspaper, the British general “realized the need to develop relations with Ukrainians a few years before the start of a full -scale war.” “He considered it necessary to do everything possible to prepare them for what was supposed to happen,” says the interlocutor of The Times. Ukraine and its allies believed that the counterattack of 2023 would become a “turning point” in the war. Optimism reigned in the coalition, its participants expected that Russian President Vladimir Putin would be forced to conclude peace. In planning the offensive, the British generals were helped by the roles of Walker and Charlie Sticland. However, the counterattack planned for spring did not begin, since Ukraine was waiting for the supply of the required amount of Western weapons. Thanks to this, as the publication of The Times, the Russian troops managed to build defense. They are involved in the Russian war with Ukraine “much deeper than previously considered”, the main investigation is asserted by The New York Times – the “Moscow” cruiser, Kursk operation and Ukrainian counterattack are involved in the Russian Counter -Station Count Deeper than previously believed, ”says The New York Times, the main thing from a big investigation is about the attack on the Moscow cruiser, the Kursk operation and the Ukrainian counter -cost of the British and American military advised Kyiv to concentrate troops in one direction, where there was the highest chance of the breakthrough. However, the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky listened to the then head of the ground forces Alexander Syrsky, who proposed to strike in the north and undertake a powerful offensive in the southeast. As a result, as the publication of The Times, instead of breaking through the defense in the south and cutting a land corridor between Russia and the occupied Crimea, the Armed Forces divided their forces. It was not possible to achieve a breakthrough. These actions, as well as the slow advance of the troops, “upset the Americans,” say the interlocutors of The Times. They “did not hide their irritation.” Ukrainians, in turn, noted that everyone, including the British and Americans, underestimated the protective structures of the Russian army. In addition, the Earth was “dotted with mines”, and drones interfered with the work of the sappers. According to the sources of the publication, at that time the relations between Ukraine and the United States “reached a critical point”. “(The head of the United Committee of the Chiefs of Staff of the US Armed Forces Mark) Millie and General Christopher Kavoli, the commander of the US Army in Europe and Africa, were very disappointed with the actions (the then commander in chief of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces). Saluzhny, in turn, was disappointed with pressure from America, ”writes The Times. In this regard with this, the chief of staff of the British Defense Staff, Admiral Tony Radakin, interrupted his vacation and went to Kyiv to rectify the situation. The plan was that Radakin would talk to the hearing and try to explain the position of Ukraine to the Americans from the video from Kyiv. At the same time, the general of Walker tried to establish relations between Americans and Ukrainians. The result of these efforts was a meeting on the Polish-Ukrainian border in which Radakin, Zaluzhny and Kavoli participated. During a five -hour conversation, they discussed plans for the actions of Ukrainian forces for the winter and next year. “It was a sign that the Americans will not refuse (from the support of Ukraine) in the near future,” notes The Times. British Admiral Tony Radakin, one of the main Western military leaders who help Kyiv with the most important thing from the text of The Guardian British Admiral Tony Radakin, one of the main Western military leaders who help Kiev, help Kyiv. to confront Russia the most important of the text The Guardian (Tagstotranslate) News
