Apple to Pay $95 Million to Settle Siri Privacy Lawsuit

Apple to Pay $95 Million to Settle Siri Privacy Lawsuit

Apple agreed to pay $95 million (roughly Rs. 814 crore) in cash to settle a proposed class action lawsuit claiming that its voice-activated Siri assistant violated users’ privacy. A preliminary settlement was filed on Tuesday night in the Oakland, California federal court. , and requires approval by US District Judge Jeffrey White.Mobile device owners complained that Apple routinely recorded their private conversations after they activated Siri unintentionally, and disclosed these conversations to third parties such as advertisers.Voice assistants typically react when people use “hot words” such as “Hey, Siri.”Two plaintiffs said their mentions of Air Jordan sneakers and Olive Garden restaurants triggered ads for those products. Another said he got ads for a brand name surgical treatment after discussing it, he thought privately, with his doctor.The class period runs from September 17, 2014 to December 31, 2024. It began when Siri incorporated the “Hey, Siri” feature that allegedly led to the unauthorized recordings.Class members, estimated in the tens of millions, may receive up to $20 (roughly Rs. 1,714) per Siri-enabled device, such as iPhones and Apple Watches.Apple denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle.The Cupertino, California-based company and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday.Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to similar requests. They may seek up to $28.5 million (roughly Rs. 244 crore) in fees, plus $1.1 million (roughly Rs. 9.43 crore) for expenses, from the settlement fund.The $95 million is about nine hours of profit for Apple, whose net income was $93.74 billion (roughly Rs. 303 crore) in its latest fiscal year.A similar lawsuit on behalf of users of Google’s Voice Assistant is pending in the San Jose, California federal court, in the same district as the Oakland court. The plaintiffs are represented by the same law firms as in the Apple case.The case is Lopez et al v. Apple Inc., US District Court, Northern District of California, No. 19-04577.© Thomson Reuters 2025(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Credit-Read More

// Function to fetch the latest posts
function fetchLatestPosts() {
const feedUrl = ‘https://newskiosk.pro/feed/’; // Replace with your blog’s RSS feed URL
fetch(feedUrl)
.then(response => response.text())
.then(str => new window.DOMParser().parseFromString(str, “text/xml”))
.then(data => {
const items = Array.from(data.querySelectorAll(“item”));
const latestPostsContainer = document.getElementById(“latest-posts”);
latestPostsContainer.innerHTML = ”; // Clear previous posts

// Shuffle the items array
const shuffledItems = items.sort(() => Math.random() – 0.5);

// Select the first 5 items from the shuffled array
const selectedItems = shuffledItems.slice(0, 5);

// Loop through the selected items and display them
selectedItems.forEach(post => {
const link = post.querySelector(“link”).textContent;
const description = post.querySelector(“description”).textContent;

// Create a new post element
const postElement = document.createElement(“div”);
postElement.classList.add(“latest-post”);
postElement.innerHTML = `

${description} Read more

`;

// Append the new post element to the container
latestPostsContainer.appendChild(postElement);
});
})
.catch(error => console.error(‘Error fetching the latest posts:’, error));
}

// Call the function to fetch and display the latest posts
fetchLatestPosts();