At present, the strategy and political actions that unfold seem to be the result of decisions taken by politicians who act dominated by the ego, patience or fear; The character of political leaders seems to be more decisive when defining a line of action than deliberations and agreements reached in public parliaments or institutions, even when it comes to decisions that affect millions of people. Political leaders no longer aspire to achieve the status of statesmen – configures that usually weigh the pros and cons of a political action – but also react directly, instantly, to the actions and provocations of their opponents. Maxim Shipenkov / Efe Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, leaders with a high concept of themselves and a clear sense of superiority, usually act more for their character than by the advice of their advisors. Instead, Xi Jinping, president of the People’s Republic of China, and Shigeru Ihiba, Prime Minister of Japan, oppose cautiously, responding without shuning political challenges and showing strategic patience in front of the new international order promoted by the United States. The weaknesses, emotions or courage of political leaders are imposed on parliamentary control by their part, the European Union, represented by Ursula von der Leyen, tends to respond showing insecurity, fearful of the possible changes in its relationship with the US, and often adopts an evasive position, conditioned by internal pressures. Read also Fèlix Riera The Envite of Donald Trump to the established order has reduced the margin to reflect on the best way to face, allowing the character of the leaders to emerge – with their psychological, emotional and moral features – who are in front of the affected countries. The direct consequence of the subordination of political institutions to the character of their leaders implies that they act outside parliaments and public opinion on behalf of the State Reason. With hardly any realization, citizens are forced to contemplate how the door opens to send soldiers to Ukraine or assume the consequences of a commercial war, as a result of the pride, fear or pride of their leaders. Weaknesses, emotions, fears, resignation or courage of political leaders are imposed on political deliberations and parliamentary control. The idea is being installed that it is better to act without institutional clippers than to articulate a broad political and social consensus, which leads, in the end, to adopt the same style of doing politics that the conceited practices.
