Trump’s associates accidentally added a journalist to a closed chat, where they discussed the blows to the Husites in Yemen. And did not even notice this after the bombing, they exchanged emoji

On March 24, the editor -in -chief of the American magazine The Atlantic, on March 24, said that the key persons of the US presidential administration Donald Trump accidentally added him to the group chat in the Signal messenger, where they discussed the blows of the positions of the Husites in Yemen. Goldberg could not believe that the chat is real. And when I realized that this was so, he left it. Other chat participants did not notice the presence of a journalist – until he himself told about this in his article. This incident dumbfounded Washington. We tell the main thing about him. Who are such Husites and why Trump ordered their attacks – this is a militarized group that unleashed a civil war in Yemen and captured a significant part of the country. Husitov supports Iran and his Lebanese proxy – the Hizball movement. After Israel began the operation in the gas sector in response to the Hamas attack in the fall of 2023, the Khusits ​​began to attack the merchant ships and warships of Israel and its allies in the Red Sea as a sign of solidarity with the Palestinians. On March 15, Donald Trump ordered US armed forces against the Husites due to their attacks on American trade ships and military ships. Trump emphasized that the answer of his predecessor Joe Bayden to the actions of the Husites “was miserable and weak”, but now “hell will fall on them”. On the night of March 16, the American army began to strike the positions of the Hussites in Yemen, which continues to this day. As the editor -in -chief of The Atlantic was in a chat to coordinate the impact of Husitamethelvred The Atlantic Jeffrey Goldberg unexpectedly found out about the attack on the Khusitov in advance. It all started on March 11, when Goldberg received a request in the Signal messenger from the user with the nickname Mike Walz. The name of the current US President for National Security is also called. Goldberg doubted that a high -ranking White House employee wanted to contact him, but he accepted the request. I considered this (Walz’s request) somewhat unusual, given the controversial relations of the Trump administration with journalists and. It immediately occurred to me that someone could be disguised as Walz to lure me into a trap. I accepted the request for the connection, hoping that this is really an adviser to national security and that he wants to talk about Ukraine, Iran or some other important issue. Two days later, March 13, he was added to the group chat in Signal. Mike Walz said this is a chat “to coordinate actions in the Husites.” He began to answer users whose nicknames sent to the names of Trump’s associates: JD Vance (Vice President Jay Di Vance), Mar (Secretary of State Marko Rubio), TG (Director of National Intelligence Tulsey Gabbard), Scott B (Minister of Finance Scott Immotent). Also in the chat were Minister of Defense Pit Hegset, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Special Steven Steve Whitkoff and others – only 18 people. Jeffrey Goldberg was present there under the nickname JG. “I do not want to save Europe again” – “I divide your aversion to European obscenity”, Glavred The Atlantic doubted that people gathered in the chat were really the closest Trump’s associates. According to him, he could not get rid of the idea that they were trying to fool him, because he could not believe that the US authorities were discussing war plans with the help of Signal, especially in the presence of a journalist. But the next day, March 14, a discussion occurred in the chat, after which Goldberg believed that in front of him people from Trump’s entourage. On this day, Jay Di Wence shared doubts about the advisability of the attack on the Husites. He emphasized that 40% of European trade passes through the Suez Canal and only 3% of the American. “I’m not sure that the president realizes how much this (attack on the Husites) does not correspond to his current idea of ​​Europe,” the vice president wrote and suggested that he postpone the attack again to evaluate potential risks and benefits. Hegset replied that he understands his doubts, but the husitarian blow would restore freedom of shipping and restraint measures, “which Biden has destroyed.” “If you think we should do this, let’s. I just don’t want to save Europe again, ”Vance answered. “I completely share your aversion to European overlap. It looks sorry, ”the head of the Pentagon wrote, but added that only the United States can ensure freedom of shipping in the Middle East. At this moment, a man entered into a conversation under the nickname SM, whom the chief editor of The Atlantic took for the deputy head of the administration of Trump Stephen Miller. He wrote that soon the United States would be made to understand Egypt and Europe, “what do we expect in return” to counteract the Husites. “If the United States successfully restore the freedom of shipping at the cost of large costs, some additional economic benefit should be extracted in return,” Miller said. Hegset replied that he agreed, and the discussion was interrupted on this. Dzheffry Goldberg left the chat after a blow to Yemen. Nobody paid attention to this on March15 the Minister of Defense published in the chat information that, according to the main edges of The Atlantic, contained “operational data on the upcoming shots of Yemen, including information about the goals, the weapons that the United States will use, and sequences of attacks.” The vice president wrote that he would “pray” for the victory. In the report of the Hegset, it was said that the first explosions in Yemen would occur in two hours later. Goldberg waited for this period to expire, and checked the posts in H. there really wrote about explosions in the dignity, the capital of Yemen. Goldberg returned to the chat, where Mike Walz called the operation “amazing work”. CIA Director John Ratcliffe wrote: “Good beginning.” Walz answered with three emoji: . Whitkoff put as many as five emojes: . Other participants in the chat joined the congratulations, and then they began to discuss the assessment of the damage caused, “including the likely death of a particular person,” Goldberg wrote that the chat was almost certainly real. Having come to this awareness, which seemed almost impossible just a few hours ago, I left the chat, realizing that Signal would automatically notify its creator about it. No one in the chat seems to have noticed that I was there. And I did not receive any questions about why I left, or, more importantly, who I am. “If these people were the younger military personnel, they would be given to the tribunal” Jeffrey Goldberg requested comments with the US presidential administration. The press secretary of the National Security Council Brian Hughes answered him two hours later. He stated that the chat, “seems to be genuine” and that the journalist was added unintentional to it. At the same time, the spokesman emphasized that the dialogue in the chat showed “deep and thoughtful political coordination between senior officials.” A number of experts did not agree to him. Several lawyers specializing in national security said The Atlantic that Walz probably violated several laws at once when he created a chat to discuss the military operation against the Husites in Signal (US officials have no right to use this messenger to exchange secret information) and added a journalist there (that is, a person who did not have the right to receive the information that he received), even if it received) It happened by chance. “This is rough negligence,” said CNN Ryan Gudman, a former special adviser to the Ministry of Defense. And Kevin Carroll, a former CIA officer and a lawyer for national security, said The Washington Post: “I defended the military personnel accused of violating the coat of spying coarse negligence for much less much less. If these people were the younger military personnel, they would be given to the tribunal. “According to the media, Trump was not going to dismiss anyone because of the leak-despite the scandal of the Democratic Party, they promised that they would ask questions about the Director of the CIA and the head of the national intelligence, which would come to the Congress on March 25 to give their assessments of the main threats of national security. Republicans who usually try not to criticize Trump. However, the speaker of the House of Representatives Loyal, Mike Johnson, said that the White House himself would make sure that such a mistake does not happen again. “I’m not sure that this requires special additional attention,” he believes. According to former officials of the Ministry of Justice, “under ordinary circumstances,” we should expect investigations from the Ministry of Justice and the FBI, but now both departments have refused to comment on the situation – like the CIA, the State Department and the Office of the National Intelligence Director. The Minister of Defense Pit Hegset denies that someone sent “military plans” to the chat. Donald Trump told NBC News that the chief of The Atlantic was in the chat, as Mike Walz received his subordinate number. This mistake did not affect the operation against the Hussites, Trump added. “Mike Walz learned a lesson, and he is a good person,” the US president summed up. Sources of WSJ said he was angry with Walz. But according to CNN, Trump is not going to dismiss him yet. This episode is important. And not only for the USA, the administration of Trump is trying to damage the significance of the leak. But this incident is important. For several reasons, in the first, because the participants of the chat in Signal could really violate the laws and put the American military in the Middle East-but judging by the reaction of Trump, this would not lead to serious consequences for officials. She used the Secretary of State Personal Email for official correspondence, including containing secret information. The Clinton and her team were condemned by Walz, Hegset and other chat participants. Thirdly, because the chat allows us to evaluate the attitude of Trump’s associates to Europe-and the observers agree that it may be worse than it seemed. European diplomats also paid attention to this. “It is incredible how perverted his (Wans) thoughts (about the benefits of Yemen’s bombing),” one of them said to the Financial Times reporters. (Tagstotranslate) News

Credit-Read More

// Function to fetch the latest posts
function fetchLatestPosts() {
const feedUrl = ‘https://newskiosk.pro/feed/’; // Replace with your blog’s RSS feed URL
fetch(feedUrl)
.then(response => response.text())
.then(str => new window.DOMParser().parseFromString(str, “text/xml”))
.then(data => {
const items = Array.from(data.querySelectorAll(“item”));
const latestPostsContainer = document.getElementById(“latest-posts”);
latestPostsContainer.innerHTML = ”; // Clear previous posts

// Shuffle the items array
const shuffledItems = items.sort(() => Math.random() – 0.5);

// Select the first 5 items from the shuffled array
const selectedItems = shuffledItems.slice(0, 5);

// Loop through the selected items and display them
selectedItems.forEach(post => {
const link = post.querySelector(“link”).textContent;
const description = post.querySelector(“description”).textContent;

// Create a new post element
const postElement = document.createElement(“div”);
postElement.classList.add(“latest-post”);
postElement.innerHTML = `

${description} Read more

`;

// Append the new post element to the container
latestPostsContainer.appendChild(postElement);
});
})
.catch(error => console.error(‘Error fetching the latest posts:’, error));
}

// Call the function to fetch and display the latest posts
fetchLatestPosts();