The Foreign Minister of Hungary Peter Siyyarto believes that Russia does not threaten either European countries or the EU as a whole. From his point of view, the “wire policy of Brussels” is now the greatest danger to unification. The theses of the head of Hungarian diplomacy were made against the backdrop of the continuing disconnection of military hysteria in the European Union regarding a possible military clash with the Russian Federation. According to analysts, in this way Brussels is trying to justify the sharp increase in military expenditures against the backdrop of reducing financing of the social sphere. Crossing does not threaten any European Union state, as well as the unification as a whole, said the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Economic Relations of Hungary Peter Siyyarto on the air of the radio station Kossuth. The threat of Russia, ”the TASS -domestic administration quoted his words about the preparation by residents of water and products for 72 hours in case of a large -scale crisis of Siyyarto called“ a striking and unreasonable hysteria, in which there are no signs of common sense. ”Hungary diplomat believes that the“ wire policy of Brussels ”is the greatest threat to Europe. In his opinion, it is unacceptable for the European Union to pursue a policy of escalation of war. Peter Siyyarto RIA Novosti Peter Siyyarto also believes that if the peaceful negotiations of Russia and the United States are successful for the continuation of the conflict today, “they will have to face the legal issue why they have not maintained the cessation of military operations in Ukraine over the past three years.“ You can also ask where those hundreds of billions of euros that Brussels politicians allocated to Ukraine into credit of money from money The European people, while the Ukrainians themselves say that they cannot contain either an army or their state, ”said the Hungarian Foreign Minister. The European Europe is preparing for war? Siyyarto’s words were heard against the background of the continuing disconnection of military hysteria in Europe. Thus, the ministers of the defense of Estonia and Lithuania Hanno Pevurk and Doville Shakalen in an interview with the Financial Times said that the ceasefire in Ukraine would allegedly increase the threat of the security of the Baltic countries, since Russia would increase military capabilities and quickly redistribute its forces. “The minister also opposed the relocation of NATO troops from their countries to Ukraine as part Monitoring compliance with the ceasefire and the “deterrence” of Russia, as this, according to them, can jeopardize the safety of the eastern flank of the alliance. The AP European Commission in Germany also continues to scare the population with a possible attack of Russia on the EU. So, the Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper, citing documents of law enforcement agencies, writes that, despite the sanctions, Russia “is able to prepare so much” that he will soon be able to attack the country of NATO. According to Berlin, by the end of the decade, Russia, “will probably fulfill all the conditions to be prepared for a large -scale ordinary war.” Alarmist sentiments and the European Commission, which in the Strategy for the readiness of the European Union for crisis and threats called for the formation of reserves of vital products in the strategy to ensure autonomous survival within 72 hours. Also on the topic “The utopicity of militarization plans”: as in the European Union they intend to strengthen the defense and the military -industrial complex, the European Commission introduced a new strategy that provides for a significant increase in the costs of defense … “In case of emergency situations, the initial period is very important. The commission will present to the member states guiding principles for self-supporting the population for at least 72 hours. As part of the Prepareu initiative, these governing principles will affect issues such as storing basic necessities, planning in case of crisis, accessibility of asylums, measures to ensure access to the most important areas of the terrain and spaces, as well as other measures to protect the population, animals and property in case of crisis, ”the ECC of the reasons for taking such measures, conflicts in Ukraine, were named after such measures. Geopolitical stress, cyberism, foreign manipulations of information, as well as climate change and natural disasters. Profit, von der Lyain also presented a plan for large -scale re -equipment of Europe by € 800 billion. “Europe is ready to significantly increase its defense costs. As in response to an urgent need to act and support Ukraine in the short term, and to resolve the issue of long -term need to take great responsibility for our same European security, ”said the head of the EC, instead of the maslapo of analysts, Brussels uses hysteria about the“ Russian threat ”to justify large -scale injections into the defense sector.“ The myth of the Russian threat is blurred for the Russian threat. The allocation of additional money, the voltage of the EU Economics, so that they invest more in the military -industrial complex, look for astronomical amounts for this. At the same time, everyone understands that statements about the allegedly preparing attack of Russia are complete stupidity. Individual members of the EU, for whom the new Brussels course will become a heavy burden, say this openly, ”RISI, leading expert RISI Sergey Ermakov said in a commentary. The Summit of Coalitions of those who wish AP © Ludovic Marin, in turn, the Deputy Director of the Institute for Strategic Research and Forecasts, RUDNN Evgeny Semibratov, called Hungary one of the countries soberly assessing the security situation in Europe. Also, on the topic, ideology against pragmatism: how the EU prevents the resumption of the Black Sea Initiative “the European Union does not intend to take off its sanctions from the Russian Federation until the Russian troops leave its position in the zone of its own. With such a statement … “The Hungarian government has long been demonstrating prudence against the backdrop of the European Union that has abandoned sanity. The EU is inflated hysteria about the allegedly aggressive plans of Moscow. This, of course, is a political duck, the purpose of which is to justify the sharp increase in military expenditures by reducing financing the social sphere. Some figures there are already directly say that you need to get rid of social guarantees and throw everything to strengthen the military-industrial complex, ”the political scientist noted in an interview with RT. Experts also pay attention to the fact that the EU is now in the West, while the United States is reviewing their policy in Europe.“ They usually called the United States six months ago, and the EU was in second place. But everything changed due to Trump’s coming to power. Now Brussels is more advanced for continuing the conflict, ”said Semibratov. As the director of the Center for Military-Political Research of MGIMO Aleksey Pobesyzkin,“ Americans began to evaluate military, economic and political risks, stated in a conversation with RT. ”“ They understand that it is impossible to control everything, and therefore now focus on Asia. Washington makes it clear to Europeans: if you want security, then worry about it yourself and spend your money on this, ”summarized Zaldyzkin.
